Goto

Collaborating Authors

 population risk function


2a91de02871011d0090e662ffd6f2328-Supplemental-Conference.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

The structure of the appendix mainly follows the roadmap of the proof described in Section 4.4. In Appendix A, we define the characterizable population risk function in (31) to approximate the objective function. Also, some notations to simplify the analysis are introduced in Appendix A, and we recommend the readers to refer to Table 3 for the major notations used in the proofs. Instead, in this paper, we consider multi-layer cases and need to derive a lower bound for the Hessian matrix for all the layers. Instead, the input of the intermediate layer cannot be proved to be Gaussian but belong to sub-Gaussian distribution.







Faster Rates of Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization

Su, Jinyan, Wang, Di

arXiv.org Machine Learning

In this paper, we revisit the problem of Differentially Private Stochastic Convex Optimization (DP-SCO) and provide excess population risks for some special classes of functions that are faster than the previous results of general convex and strongly convex functions. In the first part of the paper, we study the case where the population risk function satisfies the Tysbakov Noise Condition (TNC) with some parameter $\theta>1$. Specifically, we first show that under some mild assumptions on the loss functions, there is an algorithm whose output could achieve an upper bound of $\tilde{O}((\frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}+\frac{\sqrt{d\log \frac{1}{\delta}}}{n\epsilon})^\frac{\theta}{\theta-1})$ for $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP when $\theta\geq 2$, here $n$ is the sample size and $d$ is the dimension of the space. Then we address the inefficiency issue, improve the upper bounds by $\text{Poly}(\log n)$ factors and extend to the case where $\theta\geq \bar{\theta}>1$ for some known $\bar{\theta}$. Next we show that the excess population risk of population functions satisfying TNC with parameter $\theta>1$ is always lower bounded by $\Omega((\frac{d}{n\epsilon})^\frac{\theta}{\theta-1}) $ and $\Omega((\frac{\sqrt{d\log \frac{1}{\delta}}}{n\epsilon})^\frac{\theta}{\theta-1})$ for $\epsilon$-DP and $(\epsilon, \delta)$-DP, respectively. In the second part, we focus on a special case where the population risk function is strongly convex. Unlike the previous studies, here we assume the loss function is {\em non-negative} and {\em the optimal value of population risk is sufficiently small}. With these additional assumptions, we propose a new method whose output could achieve an upper bound of $O(\frac{d\log\frac{1}{\delta}}{n^2\epsilon^2}+\frac{1}{n^{\tau}})$ for any $\tau\geq 1$ in $(\epsilon,\delta)$-DP model if the sample size $n$ is sufficiently large.